On an evening while watching the Rachel Maddow show I heard
Mr. EJ Dionne say something that was for me the catalyst of a profound ah-ha
moment – you know what I mean suddenly a light snaps on and something you’ve
known all of your life without saying it has suddenly been said. He simply
remarked that in our system of economics, “capital is more important than
labor.”
Within seconds a series of associations popped into my mind:
money is more important than people; unearned income is more valuable than earned
income thus should be taxed less; retirement based upon accrued wealth is more deserved
than retirement based upon earned benefits.
I would even go further and say that in the presence of an
unbridled Free Market and vulture Capitalism, labor is indeed the enemy of
capital. This is the unstated assertion
that supports the belief that while the workers who walked out on strike at Wal-Mart
are disruptive-ungrateful-wanting something for nothing slugs, if not just
plain foolish, the Walton family who owns Wal-Mart is a clan of heroes in the Capitalist
paradigm for paying their employees less than is needed to support a family and
offering no benefits. Accordingly, when these worker’s families are forced to
go on public assistance such as food stamps or Medicaid in order to survive, the
moral responsibility reverts to them and them alone. They become an object of derision by the very
people who hold their offices through the legalized corruption of government by
big lobbies representing employers like the Waltons. These are the same corrupt individuals who promote
that paradigm as a secondary implication of the peddling of influence.
Any political or other leader who dares to elaborate on this
inequity too often, too loudly, or too eloquently is immediately labeled a Socialist,
a Communist, a Leninist, a Marxist and for those stupid enough to not know
their left from their right a Nazi or Fascist. Consequently, terminology like
labor’s right to have some ownership in the means of production, alienation of
labor, workers rights, Laissez-Faire Capitalism and income distribution equity
have been dumb-down and prettied up into “fairness to Middle Class
families.” The poor and the working poor
are seldom spoken of these days, although Mr. Obama often speaks of giving
those outside of the Middle Class a way in. All of this subterfuge and
linguistic sleight-of-hand contributes to a pervasive and pernicious ideology
by people such as the Waltons which can be summed up in, “we hired them; we can
kill them.” This belief has been given the force of law by their allies in the
brothel formally known as the United States Congress.
I subscribe to the Mayan belief in a radical change in the
world on December 21st, but do not accept the validity of end time prophecies. Thus,
I believe that we are entering a shift in consciousness for good or ill - it’s
hard for me to tell. However, I propose that it is possible for us to determine
the nature and quality of this shift for ourselves. One way is for labor - workers
- to take back control of the language of our liberation. We need to begin to
think and speak of ourselves as an indispensable source of production and as
wealth engendering. No fortune has ever been made without us. We are not just
the chattel of Free Market Capitalism and a consumer culture gone insane.
The intellectual sludge born in a toxic stew of corporate
arrogance and gluttony which holds that big money can continue to earn big
money without an economically empowered, constantly expanding Working/Middle Class
is evidence of the mind numbing properties of chronic greed. The consumer orgy
which corporate America has encouraged, indeed mandated, is not possible
without a fully enfranchised, stable and economically viable Working Class. You
may find this hard to believe, I did, but I actually heard a CEO of a Fortune
500 company say as much recently.
Since language is the currency of a new and shared
consciousness, it follows then that it is time for workers in this country to
stand up and demand clearly and loudly the respect they deserve as creators of
wealth both in production and consumption. It won’t do any longer to consider
workers as red marks on company balance sheets under the heading Cost of Doing Business.
We are business. We are the financial system. Without us nothing works, nothing
runs and the great engine of the economy stalls like a faulty motor.
If this is Socialism so be it. It is none of the other
aforementioned political/economic systems, and it would behoove those who don’t
know the difference to read a damn book once in a while - if they can read that
is. The question becomes, is it worse to be a so-called Socialist than it is to
be an entrepreneur who benefits from an undeclared Socialism by working their employees
for much less than is needed to subsist while throwing them off on the public
dole to subsidize their income, thus smugly expecting the taxpayer to pick up
the slack?
Labor might want to remind the consumer public that when
people don’t make enough to live on and must rely upon federal or state
government assistance the five dollar shirt happily purchased at Wal-Mart
actually costs much more. Perhaps, when Wal-Mart patrons rushing to save money
realize that they will pay for those savings out of their family budget in
sales tax or state tax or federal tax they won’t consider the bargains at Wal-Mart
such bargains.
My husband Bradley believes that an excellent way to help
reduce taxation and perhaps the deficit would be to force people like the Waltons
to pay back in taxes the money that must be taken from the tax coffers by their
employees in order to live. In addition, since these are the business owners
supporting a government culture that resists single payer medical coverage and
hates Obama Care, they might be required to help subsidize their community
hospitals to defer the cost of treating their uninsured employees.
I’m not an expert on tax policy or deficit reduction;
however, I know a little something about working for a living. The idea that
labor is a charitable investment and/or a parasitic drain on the likes of Wal-Mart
is patently stupid if not insane. It is unlikely that we will hear our elected
officials, in office or running for office, emphasize this so we must emphasize
it. Without us there are no great industries, no great corporations, no small
or large businesses - no Wal-Marts! In the final analysis capital and labor are
equal partners in the creation of any economy, particularly the Free Market Economy.
They should enjoy equal respect and recognition - if for no other reason than
because the vast majority of this country works for a living, and we are the
consumers of the products of all industries, corporations and businesses small
and large. The people who squall and whine about paying taxes at the top end of
the income scale are often the same people who are more than happy to take
advantage of the government’s ability to subsidize the income of their underpaid
employees. What can we call such infants
save entitlement babies or Welfare monarchs?