I am not a proponent of the death penalty for a number of
reasons. Beyond the obvious objection to
taking life is the simple fact that it doesn't help deter crime in anyway. To support the death penalty for me would
mean asking society to do what I could never do for myself – fire the bullet,
flip the switch, drop the rope or send the drug home. Such a sifting of responsibility is something
that I consider highly unethical. Still,
I realize that there are people whose crimes are so heinous and whose existence
on this planet is so dangerous to the rest of us that they simply can never be
allowed to live in the general population.
Given that our societal institutions are crumbling faster than our roads
and bridges, can any of us trust our prisons – particularly privately owned
prisons – to guarantee that such people never reemerge in our midst?
Having expressed all of this, it is worth noting that what
occurred in Oklahoma the night before last was not even the abomination of Capital
Punishment. It was instead a state
sponsored science experiment conducted for the political benefit of a smug and
egotistical Rightwing harpy and a retinue of followers attached to her like
head lice. It was unwillingly sanctioned
by a cowardly court that caved under threat of impeachment and was carried out
by quasi competent prison officials, one of which was masquerading as a medical
practitioner and welding an intravenous line like a stiletto with which to administer
a poisonous concoction of untried drugs that would give Edgar Allan Poe night
terrors. I submit that it is horror
shows like this played out on the international stage, as they always are, that
has eroded our moral authority in the world much more than the so-called
weakness of a president who generally prefers diplomacy to combat. What gives us the right to lecture China,
Syria, Russia, North Korea or anyone else on human rights violations given what
was done in the Sooner State this week?
When did people like Mary Fallin, the Governor of Oklahoma,
become the moral conscience of this great nation? When did mean spirited “Christians” decide
that the best part of God’s love is cruelty and punishment, and when did we
decide to allow them to foul our public persona and political dialogue with
their vile ethical perversions and religious rot? Is it through selection or apathy that we now
find the generosity of spirit and the kindness of heart which give meaning to our Exceptionalism
shivering in the cold shadow cast by the metastasizing financial malignancy that allows such politicians to slither in and
out of office on fear and the largess of corporations?
It has been swelling for decades this symphony of
corruptions. Reaching its crescendo with
the Roberts Court, everything is corruption now. Our social and political institutions, our
regard for one another, our respect for ourselves, our world view have all
soured and gone bad like milk left to stand out in the heat. Money is the heat source and everything is
for sale. One thing I know – when money
is all you want, money is all you get.
It is the only value we have left.
In the early and middle part of the last century when a Capo di tutti capi
like Torrio, Capone or Luciano funneled unknown sums of money into political campaigns
from behind closed doors it was called racketeering, bribery and graft. Today when men like Koch, Adelson and Walton
funnel unknown sums of money into political campaigns from behind closed doors it
is called Citizens United, Free Speech and Dark Money. The modern day Capo runs a corporation, usually
has a neck and someone else carries his gun.
His consiglieres, solders and enforcers roam Statuary Hall,
the corridors of Congress and state houses all over this country bullying with
money - buying influence and the politicians who peddle it.
The major difference, however, between the
mob boss of the last century and today’s version is that Torro, Capone and
Luciano never claimed to be saving the world, defending freedom or upholding a
moral society. They were just selling
vice to people who wanted to buy it. When
they killed they did it out of pure self interest and for the good of the organization,
making no pretense to the contrary.
Like it or not, the promoting of political power
has a great deal in common with the selling of vice. Maybe because the way politics is handled
post Citizens United resembles vice more than ever it resembled virtue. It is my belief that the ill thought-out,
couldn't-get-it-done-fast-enough, gruesome killing of a death row inmate in
Oklahoma on Tuesday was largely about self interest and protecting an
organization. Perhaps when we stop torturing
and slaughtering the truth we will be able to do the same for one another.